constructions on the Bible are the cause of a great deal of sickness.
Now I will give my construction - and if I do not make Jesus more of a man than the other -
then I never will attempt to explain the Bible again.
~ Phineas Parkhurst Quimby
Phineas Parkhurst Quimby
A Defense Against an Accusation
Of Putting Down Religion
I am often accused of putting down religion, and when I ask what religion is, I am told the same old story that everybody knows - to be good, worship God, etc. Now all this sort of cant may do, if it is not analyzed; but if you undertake to analyze it, it vanishes like dew before the morning sun.
Religion is what it was before Christ - and I think I know what that was. The religion that Christ opposed consisted in forms and ceremonies. Now why did Jesus oppose it, if their belief had nothing to do with their health and happiness? He never said anything to such persons, for he said, “They that are well need no physician.” So if persons were well, it made no difference to Jesus what they believed. He came to those who had been deceived by the priests and doctors.
Well, how did he cure them? By changing their minds; for if he could not change their minds, he could not cure them. This was the case with the rich young man who came to Jesus to know what he should do to be saved. Now if the young man was really in danger of being doomed to eternal punishment, as we are taught, then all that was wanted was to believe. So if his belief changed him, I ask if it changed his identity - or his mind?
We are taught that man cannot do anything of himself to save himself, but was this the case with the young man? No, for Jesus told him what to do - to keep the commandments; and these commandments were not Jesus,' but Moses.' The young man said, “This have I done from my youth up.” So according to the young man's story, he was a very good man, and Jesus found no fault with him but said, “If you would be perfect, go and sell all you have, and give it to the poor, and follow me.”
Now here was a young man who had done everything to be saved, and Jesus would not save him, unless he would give all that he had to the poor and follow him. Now as absurd as this looks, it is quoted as a command of Jesus - yet you cannot find anyone that will comply with it. They get over it by saying that we must give up all sinful acts. Well, be as honest to that young man who went away sorrowful, for he could not understand. For his beliefs were so strong that Christ answered him as much as to say, “Go, give all your ideas away, and embrace the truth.”
Now this is a fair specimen of the parables. Jesus never hinted that he or the young man had the slightest idea of another world, but it shows on the face that a man like Jesus could not be so little or narrow-minded as to send the person to endless misery, because he would not give all his riches to the poor. Such constructions on the Bible are the cause of a great deal of sickness.
Now I will give my construction, and if I do not make Jesus more of a man than the other - then I never will attempt to explain the Bible again. The Jews thought that they were the chosen people of God and were the best and knew the most. So riches were wisdom, and they were rich in the laws of Moses. This young man came to Jesus to ask him what he should do to obtain this belief that Jesus taught - eternal life. Jesus said, “Keep the commandments.” This he had done. “Well, go and give away your ideas, and try to learn mine.” This he could not do, for he could not see into it. So he went away sorrowful. Jesus' own disciples were in the same way, for they said, “We have forsaken all - what lack we more?” He then goes on to tell them what they must do, but they did it not; for they all forsook him.
Now if it requires such a sacrifice to go to heaven, then he never found one that went, for they asked him, “If these things be so, how can a man be saved?” He said, “Try. Many shall try, but few be chosen.” Is it so now? No. It is the easiest thing in the world to get religion now. All that is required is to join the church and pay the minister well, and you shall be saved. Now does anyone suppose this was Jesus' mission? If he does, I am sorry. He must have a very low opinion, if he supposes that a man's salvation depends upon a certain belief. But it does - according to the belief of our day.
Now a belief is one thing, and the thing to believe is another. I will here illustrate. We all admit the spine. Well, how many have seen one? Not one in a thousand. So one tells what he sees, and all tell what they believe. Now suppose a person says, “The spine is affected,” and another believes it; then to him it is so, and this belief makes him unhappy. Now is it the spine that is unhappy or the belief? It must be the belief, for there is nothing of the sick man but beliefs.
So you can see that all his sickness is ignorance (or beliefs). Now if you satisfy him that he is mistaken - and he believes it - then his spine is not affected, and you change his mind. Now he is happy. Is the spine happy or his mind?Now you see that the belief is one thing, and the thing believed is another. The spine is one thing, and the belief is another; so that our happiness and misery are only our beliefs, and the thing believed has neither happiness nor misery.
Now it is of vast importance to man to know what to believe, for that which we know we have no belief of - but proof; so that which we do not know is a mystery and causes a belief. Now there are certain things that all admit, based on scientific principles. Then there are other things that are admitted but have no proof; only as the error has made it. For instance, religion is one of the things that is based on an opinion and not on science.
The science is the thing (or substance), and the belief of it is religion; and we are happy or miserable, just according to our belief. The masses' and the religious world's religion is in their belief. Jesus' religion was the science, itself. So you see that man reasons about religion, just as he does about everything else - that the happiness or misery is in the spine, and the belief is something else.
Now here is my religion. Mine, as that of Jesus, is in my acts - not in my belief. The sick are in their belief and not in their acts; for if it were in their acts, they would be better. For to be wise is to be good; and to be good is to show your goodness in your acts. So if a man is sick, he is not good; and if he is not good, he is not happy. And if he is not good, that which is bad must be something else than good. His goodness is science (or Christ); his badness must be an opinion (or religion).
Now to be born again is to separate the true religion from the dross, and I know of no better rule than Jesus laid down. He said, “By their fruits, ye shall know them, whether they be of man or of God (or science).” Now I am willing to be judged by my works - and if they bear me out, then I do not know as the wisdom of this world of opinions has any right to pass judgment on me.
I will now show what Jesus' religion was. We are often told of the religion of Christ, but when we ask what it is, it cannot be separated from infidelity (or this world), so I will try to define his religion. You remember I said that a belief was one thing, and the thing believed was another. Now Jesus' religion was the Christ (or the substance), and the disciples and the multitude were the believers of the substance; not seen, but in the heavens. So Christ is the substance (or science) (or the religion of Jesus). The Christian religion is in a belief of that substance called “Christ,” “Wisdom” or “God,” - and my religion is my wisdom and not my belief. And when I come to the sick, I put my religion in practice - and not my opinion.
When I talk to the well, I talk about it; for those that are well need no physician. My opinion is worth just as much as anyone's. I look upon all opinions as man's wisdom; they are worth what they will bring. They may be right, but they are often wrong. When I sit by a person, if I find no opinion, I find no disease. But if I find a disease, I find an opinion. So that the misery that is in the opinion (or belief) is the disease. I have to make war with the disease (or opinion), and as there are a great many that make their disease out of the world's opinions of religion, it is my duty to change their belief, in order to make the cure.
It is astonishing to see persons cling to their opinions, just as though they contain the substance, when if they knew the substance of their belief, they would laugh at their folly. Now to me, it is as plain as twice two makes four. I can sum up the religion of this world and the religion of Jesus in one simple parable - that is the parable of the child, when the people were disputing about the kingdom of heaven. Jesus took up a little child from their midst and said, “Of such is the kingdom of heaven; except ye become as little children ye cannot enter into the kingdom of heaven.” So the world, as a Christian world, has tried to imitate the child. And I cannot dispute that in most of their acts they have fallen short of the child - for he is ignorant of all their errors, and as ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise (or in error).
Now this is the true meaning of the parable of the child. Science is not included in the Christian religion; neither wisdom of any kind. The religion was made up of all the superstitions of Egyptian darkness, so that every man and woman was not in a fit state to become a disciple of Christ (or science). So Jesus wanted to show the people, by a parable, what was wanted to get a person into the right state of mind to receive the kingdom of heaven (or science).
Everyone knows it is harder to unlearn an error than to learn a truth. So Jesus - knowing that a child was free from both - took him as a parable; so that the Christian world must give away (or get rid of) all their errors and become as a little child to receive the Holy Ghost (or science). This was the new birth. Therefore, to enter into science (or the kingdom of heaven) was not a very easy thing. So if anyone said he was born of God (or science) - let him show it. For many shall come saying, “I am Christ,” and shall deceive many; but by their fruits ye shall know them. So you see that Jesus' religion had nothing to do with the opinions of this world. His was of wisdom, and wisdom is something that is solid. Error (or opinions) are about this solid; and opinion is the world's religion, but Jesus' religion was the substance - and that was what the sick had been robbed of, by the blind guides. All I do is to put in their possession what they have been unjustly robbed of.